|
Post by realtrottersforever on Feb 18, 2016 11:25:04 GMT
|
|
|
Post by modfishy on Feb 18, 2016 13:13:27 GMT
Sorry I can't offer any explanation to this, you are right though the whole saga has been a shambles! Personally I don't want us to go into administration this season as I believe that Neil Lennon has the ability to get these players motivated and they do try and win games, with a bit more luck I think we can still get out of this and will be better off with new owners in the championship rather than league 1.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2016 14:04:33 GMT
I think I can help re the car park ,the club has been paid the money but the developers have put the charge on just in case the club goes bust , this means that the developing company will not lose out if that happens , the development was always a shared thing but of course if BWFC are no more then development will not take place as the car park will be part of BWFC assets and would be sold in the liquidation process.
As for the other ED has said in not so many words that admin will not take place (if you believe him) guess we just have to wait and see. hope that clears some things for you .
|
|
|
Post by realtrottersforever on Feb 18, 2016 14:23:29 GMT
I think I can help re the car park ,the club has been paid the money but the developers have put the charge on just in case the club goes bust , this means that the developing company will not lose out if that happens , the development was always a shared thing but of course if BWFC are no more then development will not take place as the car park will be part of BWFC assets and would be sold in the liquidation process. As for the other ED has said in not so many words that admin will not take place (if you believe him) guess we just have to wait and see. hope that clears some things for you . But if we have sold the car park, it is no longer an asset. So even if we go bust the company that has bought it, own it, it is their asset, so why the charge on the hotel etc. If they have lent us the money, against a possible joint venture, then fair enough, but in that case we have not sold the car park, so why say that we have ? It's all just smoke and mirrors.
|
|
|
Post by thegrud1 on Feb 18, 2016 15:46:20 GMT
Did we not borrow the money to buy the car park ,with the hotel as surity?
|
|